Keeping Your Divorce Costs in Check: Practical Tips for a Cost-Effective Divorce

Divorce can be emotionally challenging, and it can also take a toll on your finances. To help you navigate this difficult time while keeping costs down, we’ve compiled a comprehensive list of practical suggestions that can make a significant difference in the overall expense of your divorce.

Effective Communication with Your Attorney

Effective communication with your attorney is the cornerstone of a cost-effective divorce. Here’s a more detailed look at this essential aspect:

Set a Regular Update Schedule: Instead of reaching out to your attorney every time a thought pops into your head, establish a regular communication schedule. Weekly updates, combined with your questions, encourage you to consolidate your thoughts, which can streamline your attorney’s responses and minimize billable hours.

Use Clear and Concise Language: When communicating with your attorney, use clear and concise language to convey your thoughts and concerns. This clarity can prevent misunderstandings, reducing the need for additional discussions and expenses.

Timely Information Gathering

The efficient gathering of information can significantly impact your divorce costs. Here’s how you can be more proactive in this regard:

Respond Promptly to Requests: Whenever your attorney requests specific information, responding promptly is vital. Providing all necessary documents and details in one comprehensive response reduces the need for multiple follow-ups, saving both time and money.

Organize Your Documents: Maintain a well-organized file of all relevant documents. Categorize them by type, date, and relevance, making it easier for both you and your attorney to access crucial information quickly.

Consult Your Attorney While Negotiating with Your Spouse

Frankly, it is a lot better for your finances if you and your spouse can resolve some of your issues without attorney involvement.  Think about it:  If every issue, no matter how minute, had to be run through attorneys in order to be resolved, the amount of billable time in your matter will skyrocket.  Before engaging in negotiations with your spouse, however, it’s wise to consult your attorney.  Here’s why this step is crucial:

Legal Guidance: Your attorney offers invaluable guidance, ensuring that your negotiations align with your best interests. They can also help you navigate complex legal matters, potentially saving you from costly mistakes that can arise from uninformed decisions.

Ask Questions When in Doubt: If you’re unsure about any aspect of the negotiations or the legal process, don’t hesitate to ask your attorney. Clarifications can prevent costly misunderstandings or errors.  Your attorney should be glad to explain anything to you and should make legal concepts as accessible and understandable as possible for you.

Review Attorney Communications Carefully

Attorneys often send important communications, and it’s crucial to pay close attention to them:

Proactive Approach: Many questions you may have can be addressed within the communications sent by your attorney’s office. Reading them carefully and seeking clarification only when necessary can save you from incurring additional billable hours. It’s a proactive approach to staying informed.

Keep an Organized Record: Maintain a record of all communications with your attorney. This record ensures that you can easily reference past discussions, minimizing the need to revisit the same topics.

Avoid Aggressive Attorneys

Selecting the right attorney is pivotal in keeping costs down. Here’s why you should avoid overly aggressive attorneys:

Billable Hour Model: Some attorneys have a business model that relies on fostering aggression and prolonging the divorce process to bill more hours. Opt for an attorney who prioritizes resolution and cooperation, as this can lead to a more cost-effective and efficient divorce.  If both you and your spouse retain attorneys who are resolution minded and not out to fan the flames, you have a much better chance of keeping your legal costs down compared to a lengthy legal battle.

Additional Tips for a Cost-Effective Divorce

Open and Honest Communication: Fostering open and honest communication with your spouse can facilitate smoother negotiations. A willingness to discuss matters openly can lead to more amicable and cost-effective solutions.

Create a Detailed Budget: Planning your finances carefully during the divorce process is essential. Consider all expenses, including legal fees and post-divorce costs, to avoid financial surprises that can inflate the overall cost.

Seek Expert Advice: Consult financial experts when necessary. Their expertise can help you make well-informed decisions about property division, alimony, and other financial matters.

Stay Organized: Keeping all your divorce-related documents and correspondence organized is a practical way to save time and money in legal fees. A well-organized approach ensures that nothing is overlooked and helps maintain clarity throughout the process.

Stay Informed: Familiarize yourself with your state’s divorce laws and regulations. Understanding the legal framework can help you make informed decisions and minimize costly legal disputes.

Consider Alternative Dispute Resolution: Explore alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation or collaborative law, which can lead to cost savings by avoiding contentious court battles.

In conclusion, navigating a divorce is never easy, but these practical tips and additional suggestions can help you keep costs in check while ensuring a smoother process. By following these recommendations and choosing an attorney who aligns with your goals, you can make the journey to resolution less financially burdensome.  At Artemis Family Law Group, we are ready to help you navigate your divorce in a cost-effective manner, so please schedule a consultation today.

From High-Conflict to Effective Co-Parenting: Restoring Respect & Trust

During and after a highly contentious case involving children, achieving a healthy co-parenting relationship can seem like a hopeless undertaking.  Overwhelmed by anger, hurt, and sadness perceived to be caused by the other parent, the thought of respecting and trusting that person ever again seems laughable.  However, respect and trust are the foundations of a successful co-parenting relationship.  In order to move from high conflict to positive co-parenting, parents need to re-establish (or establish) these essential components.

RESPECT: THE FIRST COMPONENT

Any healthy, positive co-parenting relationship begins with respect.  Respect is the first prerequisite of successful co-parenting.  Without respect, nothing else can be built.  Respect is a mutual acknowledgement by both parents of the other’s rights, opinions, and boundaries.  Respect is essential in co-parenting for the following reasons:

  1. Increases the Emotional Well-Being of Children. Showing respect for each other creates a safe and stable environment for children. Children obviously benefit from watching their parents interact consistently in a kind and civil way.
  2. Provides Positive Role Modeling. Parents are the leading role models for their children. Showing respect for each other sets a positive example for children and teaches them to engage respectfully with other people. This then leads to healthier personal relationships for them in the future.
  3. Creates Cooperation. Cooperation is crucial in co-parenting. When parents respect each other, they further the feelings of cooperation, making it easier to work together in mutual decision-making regarding their children.
  4. Leads to Productive Conflict Resolution. Respect, and being respectful, during disagreements with the other parent leads to more productive resolutions. Conflict is going to occur, but devolving to disrespect and making cutting comments never leads to a good outcome.

TRUST: THE SECOND COMPONENT

Trust is the connector that allows parents to work together effectively in co-parenting. Trust flows from respect. Without trust, parents will not be able to share information, make joint decisions, or align their parenting.   Trust is essential in co-parenting for the following reasons:

  1. Acceptance of Other Parent’s Reliability. Trusting the other parent means that you feel you can rely on the other parent to satisfy their responsibilities and commitments.  Trust leads to believing that the other parent will do what they should and said they would.
  2. Decreases Stress. This is a natural progression once a parent believes that the other parent is reliable. With trust, co-parents will spend less time worrying about the other’s intentions and ability to fulfill their obligations.  This would obviously then lead to a more positive co-parenting relationship.
  3. Leads to Effective Joint Decision Making. Trust is critical for parents making decisions together. Parents can work together more efficiently for their children’s best interests when they mutually trust each other’s judgment.

RE-ESTABLISHING (OR, ESTABLISHING) RESPECT & TRUST*

In order to re-establish (or, establish) respect and trust, parents can take the following actions:

  1. Support the other parent’s relationship with the children with regular contact (in-person and virtually).
  2. Have the children ready and on-time for the exchange to the other parent.
  3. Not argue or create conflict during the exchanges of the children.
  4. Allow the children to take their favorite things to and from each parent’s homes.
  5. Follow comparable routines at each parent’s home.
  6. Support relationships with other important people in the children’s lives (i.e., grandparents; stepparents; siblings; etc.)
  7. Remain flexible with schedules when the children have special events with the other parent or other parent’s family members.
  8. Give advance notice to the other parent regarding necessary changes in the time-sharing schedule or when special events occur.
  9. Provide recognition to the other parent when they do things better or differently in a positive way in their co-parenting,

 

Respect and trust are the essential components of positive co-parenting. They create a healthy environment for children to thrive emotionally and make it easier for parents to work together for the benefit of their children.  If, through a high conflict case involving the children, trust and respect have been damaged, these can be repaired.  Ultimately, shifting from a high-conflict relationship to a positive co-parenting one helps everyone involved, especially those that matter the most to both parents—the children.  If you would like to discuss co-parenting issues or any other family law issue, please schedule a consultation today.

 

*From Martha Kline Pruett, PhD, MSL, ABPP’s presentation “Too Much Conflict, Not Enough Trust and Respect

 

Co-Parenting Conflict and Children: What the Research Reveals*

As a family law attorney and a Guardian ad Litem, I have witnessed parents so firmly entrenched in their anger or hurt with each other that, often, they fail to recognize how their conflict affects the children.  These parents may be absolutely focused on the resentment and unresolved issues surrounding the breakdown of their relationship, that it becomes difficult to see beyond their own perspective.  Consumed by their own emotional upheaval, parents cannot comprehend the significant impact that the research shows their high-conflict co-parenting can have on their children.

FACTS ABOUT CONFLICT

Children are aware of their parents’ conflict. Parents may believe that they are successful in keeping the conflict between them hidden from their children.  However, children are very perceptive to the feelings of tension and unspoken signals of anger.  Research has also shown that while in the womb, children are able to distinguish conflict in tones of voices.

Bottom-line: You are not hiding anything from the kids.

Children do not become acclimated to their parents’ conflict. According to many research findings, children do not one day become “used to” the conflict occurring between their parents.  In fact, when children are subjected to continued conflict between their parents, the children’s negative responses become increasingly intensified.

Bottom-line: Your conflict never becomes “normal” to your children.

Parents’ conflict has consequences on children at every developmental stage. Children between the ages of 2 years-old to teenagers will both externalize and internalize the conflict. Thus, they will direct their behavior outward (i.e., by acting out, being aggressive, etc.).  They will also direct their behavior inward (e., by withdrawing, expressing sadness, etc.).  Children will commonly blame themselves for the conflict that is happening between their parents.  Further, no matter the age of the children, when the conflict between their parents increased, children gauged the possibility of harm also increasing.

Bottom-line: Your conflict is going to affect your children regardless of their age.

What matters is how parents manage conflict – not that conflict simply exists between parents. Children do not suffer negative consequences from the fact that their parents have conflict.  The important part of conflict occurring between parents is how the parents handle the actual conflict. When conflicts involve peaceful and constructive discussions, encouragement, and care, children have higher levels of positive emotions.  In contrast, when conflicts involved threats, hostility (verbal and non-verbal), insults, defensiveness, and withdrawal, children have higher levels of negative emotions.  A very important factor was whether the parents resolved the conflicts. Children are affected positively when parents reach a resolution to their conflicts.  In fact, if there was any movement toward resolving the conflict, children benefited positively.

Bottom-line: Do not be a jerk when arguing with the other parent; instead, reach resolutions through civil, constructive, and caring discussions.   

 

WAYS CHILDREN ARE AFFECTED BY CONFLICT

Hostile and high-conflict co-parenting:

  1. Leads to a multitude of behavioral problems in children, which are internalized and externalized
  2. Can result in behavioral, emotional, and social issues
  3. Weakens actual parenting
  4. Overall, harms children’s well-being

 

SIGNIFICANT FACTORS REGARDING CONFLICT AFFECTING  CHILDREN’S ADJUSTMENT

FOLLOWING PARENTS’ DIVORCE

  1. Type of conflict
  2. Amount of child’s exposure to the conflict
  3. Whether the child is the focus of the conflict
  4. Whether the child witnesses the conflict
  5. Whether the conflict is high-conflict

The scenario of warring parents so rooted in their dislike for each other after the breakdown of their relationship is a cliché in family law. This situation is bad enough; however, it becomes even more unfortunate when they fail to recognize that their children have become the collateral damage in their war. These parents may not intend to harm their children; yet, because they are consumed by the emotions involved in the conflict with the other parent, they cannot fully understand what the research has made overwhelmingly clear: High-conflict between parents leads to a negative effect on children’s overall well-being and development.

The above may seem obvious, but learning how conflict and divorce affects children when they discuss it themselves really drives the point home. “Split: The EARLY Years” (2013) shows the effect of divorce on children as told by the children when the divorce was relatively new, and “Split Up: The TEEN Years (2023), follows up with these children 10 years later.  These films should be compulsory viewing for parents locked in the cycle of high-conflict co-parenting.  After watching these heart rendering films, parents would hopefully prioritize their children’s needs and work to foster a healthier environment for their children and each other.  The Artemis Approach keeps the best interests of children at the forefront of any family law matter.  If you would like to discuss how we can assist you in your family law matter, please schedule a consultation today.

 

*Research summarized and information provided by Marsha Kline Pruett, PhD, MSL, ABPP in her presentation, “Too Much Conflict, Not Enough Trust and Respect”

UPDATED: Amendments to Family Law Rule Improves Financial Privacy in Some Divorces

New Rule 12.285

On September 7, 2023, the Florida Supreme Court announced amendments to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.285 related to mandatory financial disclosure requirements.  Under previous versions of the rule, parties were required to file and serve their financial affidavits, with the only exception being simplified dissolutions of marriage with no minor children and no support issues, which are rare.

Under the new Rule 12.285, the parties may agree to forego filing their financial affidavits with the court.  Instead, the parties must file a joint verified waiver of filing financial affidavits.   According to the new rule, in the joint verified waiver the parties must acknowledge the following:

A.  that evidence of their current or past financial circumstances may be necessary for future court proceedings;

B.  they each have provided the other with a fully executed and sworn financial affidavit in conformity with Florida Family Law Form 12.902(b) or 12.902(c), as applicable;

C.  that the responsibility to retain copies of all affidavits exchanged rests solely with the parties;

D.  that the waiver only applies to the current filing and does not automatically apply to any future filings; and

E.  that the waiver may be revoked by either party at any time.

Rule 12.285(c)(2), Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure.

Thus, according to the new rule, the parties must still provide each other with completed and sworn financial affidavits, but they are not necessarily required to file them.  They must also ensure that they have properly retained copies of the exchanged affidavits among themselves as the court will not have copies to maintain.  While the new rule was announced on September 7, 2023, it does not become effective until November 1, 2023.

Limited Application of New Rule 12.285

While the new 12.285 could apply to any case, realistically speaking if your matter is contested and the judge is having to decide financial matters, whether temporary support during your divorce, or resolving financial issues like alimony, child support, etc. at a trial, both parties will have to file financial affidavits so the court can review and weigh that evidence.  It is also going to be vital to ensure that the financial affidavits are part of the trial court’s record if the matter ends up before the appellate court.  Failure to include financial affidavits in the record on appeal could very well result in an unsuccessful appeal due to an incomplete record.

So, in what circumstances will the new 12.285 apply?  Collaborative divorces are a primary candidate for 12.285’s financial affidavit filing waiver.  Additionally, uncontested divorces are also likely to take advantage of the new rule, as they don’t require court intervention to reach a resolution.  Another scenario that could apply is contested divorces that are able to reach a resolution at mediation or at any point before court intervention is required.  Importantly, however, the parties would have to agree to simply exchange completed and sworn financial affidavits during the mandatory disclosure process and wait to see if filing them becomes necessary.

Why Does This Matter?

Financial affidavits are incredibly detailed documents, containing every facet of a family’s financial standing, including incomes, all debts, monthly payments to creditors, monthly bills, and all assets such as real property, investment and retirement accounts, and jewelry, to name just some of the required items.  Filing a financial affidavit makes it part of the public record, accessible to anyone who would seek to view it.  Many individuals value their privacy and would prefer not to have that much of their financial life placed into the view of the public.  The new Rule 12.285 provides a way to avoid so much public financial exposure.

UPDATE:  Affidavit of Income For Child Support; Standard Notice of Verified Waiver of Filing Financial Affidavits

Since the revisions to Rule 12.285, discussed above, which permitted parties to waive the requirement of filing financial affidavits, the Florida Supreme Court has created a new form to address a shortcoming in the new rule.  Financial affidavits are used to determine parties’ incomes in order to calculate child support.  Without financial affidavits filed, the court does not have a basis to ensure child support is being calculated correctly.  To remedy this problem, the Florida Supreme Court created a new form, the Affidavit of Income for Child Support.  This form is limited to just the financial information needed to calculate child support and is therefore less invasive than the standard financial affidavit, which encompasses every aspect of a person’s financial life.  As a part of these revisions, the Florida Supreme Court also implemented a standard form for the Notice of Joint Verified Waiver of Filing Financial Affidavits, which the Court had previously declined to adopt.

Thus, there is now a standard form for the Notice of Joint Verified Waiver of Filing Financial Affidavit and for the new Affidavit of Income for Child Support to guide parties through this process.

If you have any questions about how best to maintain your financial privacy in a divorce, please click here to schedule a consultation from the convenience of your computer or mobile device.

What Your Family Law Attorney Might Not Be Telling You (But Should): Part 2

A previous article, “What Your Family Law Attorney Might Not Tell You(But Should): Part 1,” discussed central truths about family law cases that often go unexpressed by family law attorneys to their clients.  With this “Part 2,” we resume the forthright discussion about the realities in family law cases that your attorney may have left unsaid, but that you should really understand.

 

  1. The Impact of Social Media. In these modern times, social media plays a large role in many people’s lives. Your attorney might mention offhandedly to be cautious on what you post on social media; however, in reality, individuals involved in family law cases, especially contentious ones, should avoid using social media altogether.  Clients should recognize the potential consequences of their activity on social media. Anything you share can be used against you in court.  These posts may negatively impact the outcome of your family law case.  This also applies to posts on the social media accounts of your friends or new girlfriend or boyfriend.  Many people believe they are somehow invisible while on other people’s accounts, but you can be sure, one of the first things the opposing party informed their lawyer of was the name of your new girlfriend or boyfriend. That attorney then found them on social media, took screenshots of all the vacations and shopping trips you took together, ready to use this evidence to eviscerate your claims of impoverishment.

 

  1. Honesty about Everything is Essential. That last sentence above brings us to this: You need to be absolutely honest about everything to your attorney. Further, this honesty needs to start from the very beginning. Honesty is critical during the entire process. Your attorney is not going to judge you; however, they may very much dislike you after they are surprised-attacked by opposing counsel with something they had no knowledge of, and essentially, made them look foolish.  In some cases, the withholding of the truth is so extreme, your attorney may decide that they do not wish to damage their reputation by continuing to work with you and will withdraw from your case.  Another very important consideration is that courts make many decisions based on the credibility of parties while testifying. Being cagey or untruthful in court is a guaranteed way to torpedo your case.

 

  1. There is No Real Privacy. Being honest about everything ties in with this truth: Once you become involved in a family law case (again, especially a contentious one), there is no real privacy.  You must understand that it will become necessary for your life to be an “open book.” So, please do not feel offended if your attorney asks you some very personal questions or asks you to provide a response to what the opposing party has alleged. Different aspects of your personal life are going to be studied because, for instance, it may affect your contact with your children or your finances will be scrutinized because it may affect your alimony claim.  It is best to be open and honest about everything so that you and your attorney can prepare for anything that may come up.

 

  1. Frequently, There is a Difference between What is Legal and What Seems Fair. Some family law attorneys will simply tell their clients what they believe they want to hear. “Of course, you will get X, Y, Z” or, I can guarantee I can get X, Y, Z for you.” However, as much as an attorney can advocate for their client’s best interests, you must also understand that they can only work within the constraints of the law.  Many times, the hard truth of what actually can or does occur in your case given the state of the law, feels completely unfair. The laws may go against your goals or what you feel you deserve in this case. Unfortunately, there is often a difference between what the law can do and what seems fair. You need to appreciate this difference at the outset so that your expectations are tempered.

 

  1. Emotional Toll. Being involved in a family law case can be one of the most stressful times in your life.  The continued stress, anxiety, anger, etc. during your family law case (and after its conclusion can have a huge emotional toll on you. You need to have a good support system of friends and family. Moreover, there should be no shame surrounding receiving help through therapy or support groups. You will need and appreciate the emotional and practical assistance these different people can provide during a challenging family law case.

 

  1. Litigation is the Worst. All the truths contained above lead to this reality that many family law attorneys will not tell you: Litigation is the worst way to proceed in a family law case. Litigation can be a challenging, extremely stressful, and a resource-intensive process. The only people who really benefit from a traditional litigation model are the attorneys. The alternatives to litigation, such as the Collaborative model, uncontested model, or pre-suit mediation, offer real advantages over the traditional litigation model. The Collaborative model, specifically, prioritizes cooperation, transparency, privacy, and allows individuals to come up with agreements that are mutually beneficial and best for their particular family – often crafting agreements that courts cannot (due to those constraints of the law). Lastly, this alternative is superior to the traditional litigation model because the Collaborative model helps preserve relationships between the parties.

Appreciating these realities provides a deeper understanding of the inner workings of the legal process, potential hazards, and better approaches to family law cases.  Hopefully, supplied with these insights, you will be well-equipped to navigate your personal family law case.  Artemis Family Law Group would also be prepared to assist you in any family law matter.  Please click here to schedule a consultation.

Parallel Parenting: When Co-Parenting Won’t Work

Co-parenting during and after a divorce isn’t easy, even under the best of circumstances.  It asks a lot of both parents:  to set aside or ignore their feelings toward their ex-spouse, to put on a happy face during exchanges when they are emotionally distraught, and to restrain themselves when potentially triggering comments are made by their ex-spouse.  Many divorces are based, in part, on communication issues between spouses, so there is no reason to think those communication issues will simply vanish when it comes to co-parenting.  Fortunately, something called “parallel parenting” offers another option, in particular in high-conflict situations.

What is Parallel Parenting?

Parallel Parenting is a type of parenting in which both parents severely limit their communications and contact with each other.  Often they agree to one specific form of communication, usually written, such as text messages, email, or use of a third-party parenting app.  Instead of parents speaking regularly to each other about their children, they limit their communication to only that which is necessary, and usually only when an exchange has occurred or is occurring.  For example one spouse may text the other that a child has a cold before dropping him off with the other parent.  Otherwise, communications are limited to only what is strictly necessary.  “Just the facts, ma’am.”  No one is asking about each other’s weekends or how the new job is going.

In more high-conflict parallel parenting arrangements, the children are exchanged in “neutral” third-party locations, such as a parking lot, instead of at either spouse’s residence, which can trigger conflict.

While the ideal arrangement is healthy co-parenting in which both parents are able to communicate robustly about and around their children, this is simply not a realistic option for many parents.  In those situations, it is in the best interests of the children that they be sheltered from parenting conflicts, even if it means setting up strict communication boundaries between parents.

Parallel Parenting Doesn’t Need to be Permanent

Just because a rigid Parallel Parenting arrangement is necessary during a divorce, or immediately upon conclusion of a divorce, does not mean that it will be necessary forever.  Often Parallel Parenting offers parents the opportunity to get comfortable with their new lives, their new independence, and their new roles as single parents.  This can provide the hostility and negative emotions between parents the opportunity to dissipate.  Once things have “cooled down” between the parents–after a few months, or a few years–they can allow their Parallel Parenting arrangement to evolve into a more traditional co-parenting relationship, with stronger communication and integration between the parents.  Text messages only become phone calls and FaceTimes as well; exchanges at the mall parking lot start to occur at the parents’ residences; parents start to share details about the children’s time with them with the other parent.  Sometimes getting to a point like this requires distance and strong boundaries at first to get there.

Parallel Parenting Isn’t Just for High-Conflict Divorces

When you receive your Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, you will be legally divorced, and you will be financially divorced.  However, in many cases you will not be close to emotionally divorced yet.  Couples often focus so much on the details of the divorce itself while it is happening that they do not take the time to process the emotional cost of being divorced officially.  Even if you are on decent terms with your former spouse, coming out of a divorce can be a difficult time, one in which boundaries and limited overlap between the parents may provide both parents the opportunity to “move on,” which they were unable to do while in the midst of a divorce.  A less rigid form of Parallel Parenting can aid couples who need the time and distance to process their divorce before establishing a new co-parenting relationship in the future.  Opting for a short- or medium-term Parallel Parenting arrangement can often be the best way for families to move into healthy long-term dynamics.

Figuring out the best parenting arrangement for your family can be one of the most difficult decisions you make during a divorce, but it is also often the most important.  Each family is unique and as such no one-size-fits-all Parenting Plan will work for every family.  When you are ready to explore your options and discuss parenting further, click here to schedule a consultation.

What Factors Are Used to Calculate Child Support?

The financial support of children by their parents is a central issue in Florida family law.  For the  State of Florida, the principle behind child support consists of parents having a duty to provide support for their children.  This duty ensures their children’s financial needs are met, and also, ensures these financial needs do not become the responsibility of the State. In some cases, parents will duke it out over the child support guidelines calculations — some concerned that they might have to pay “too much;” some concerned they will receive “too little;” and many, concerned the other parent is misrepresenting facts to manipulate the child support calculations in their favor.

Basis for child support calculations in Florida.  The relevant law regarding child support and child support calculations is §61.30, Florida Statutes.  This statute establishes the guidelines on which child support is calculated.  The guidelines take into consideration various factors in determining what amount of support each parent will contribute given their circumstances.  These factors include the income of both parents; the number of children; the cost of health insurance for the children; the cost of day care for the children; and the number of overnights each parent has with the children.

Income Determination.  The main factor in calculating child support is the monthly gross income of both parties.  Gross income is income before taxes and other allowed deductions are subtracted. The statute gives 14 items that would be included in determining income.  The items that are frequently at issue are discussed further below:

  1. Salary or wages. Calculating income for a parent that works a straightforward W2 job is fairly uncomplicated. In instances where the parent works a job with varied hours, such as  nurses, firefighters, police officers, etc., it becomes less simple.  However, the proper method to calculate income in these instances is to annualize the parent’s income based on the year-to-date gross pay on their most recent paystub.
  2. Bonuses, commissions, allowances, overtime, tips, etc. The argument heard frequently about bonuses, commissions, overtime, etc. is that these things are “not guaranteed” so they should not be included when determining gross income. However, these things are specifically identified in the statute as being part of gross income.  Just as in determining salary with varied hours, bonuses, overtime, tips, etc. should be annualized based on the total year-to-date of these things on the parent’s most recent paystub.
  3. Business income from self-employment, partnership, close corporations, and independent contractors. Determining a parent’s gross income from business income is another area that frequently causes issues.  Business income is defined as the gross receipts of the business minus the ordinary and necessary expenses needed to generate the income.  Seems simple enough; however, some parents will purposely run their business in ways to give the appearance of having a low income.

Deductions.  Once the parent’s gross income is calculated, certain allowable deductions are then subtracted from it, resulting in the parent’s net income.  These allowable deductions include things such as federal, state, and local income tax; mandatory union dues; mandatory retirement; and health insurance costs for the parent and not including the children at issue.

Imputation of Income.  Routinely, one parent believes that in order to get out of paying child support, the other parent will simply quit their job . Or one parent does, in fact, quit their job, believing that they have outsmarted everyone by doing so and they will not have to pay child support.  This is absolutely not the case.  In these cases, the court can consider factors such as work history, education, qualifications, and the normal earning levels in the area to determine that parent’s potential and likely earnings.  Imputation of income can also be used in cases where a parent quits their job to work at a lower paying one or where they refuse to provide any financial information.  Unless a parent has been deemed 100% disabled, the position of the court is, at minimum, they could be employed earning the current minimum wage in Florida.

Number of Children and Amount of Time-Sharing.  The number of children that parents have together and subject to the child support the parents are attempting to establish is a factor to be considered in the calculation of child support.  As might be expected, the more children you have, the higher your child support would be.  Further, the amount of time-sharing each parent has with the children affects the child support calculation.  The child support figure is adjusted when the child spends a “substantial” amount of time with each parent.  It is important to note that a “substantial” amount of time means that a child spends at least 20% of overnights (73 overnights in a year) with each parent. Moreover, as indicated, it is the overnights that are  significant.  Thus, for example, it does not matter if your child spends 8 hours every Saturday with you, but at night sleeps at the other parent’s home. Those 8 hours or various other hours during the day would not be added up and counted as “your time.” In this example, Saturdays would be counted as the other parent’s overnight.

Medical Insurance and Childcare Costs.  The costs of medical insurance (including vision and dental insurance) for the child and costs for childcare that are necessary due to a parent working are added to the calculation of child support.  The parent who actually pays for the medical insurance or the childcare essentially receives a credit for these payments in the calculation and both parents then pay a percentage toward them based on their respective incomes.  As a sidenote, because childcare costs may change dramatically (for instance, when a child is in daycare and subsequently, enters kindergarten, no longer needing daycare), it is beneficial to leave childcare costs outside of the actual child support calculation and instead, the parents pay this expense separately on the same percentage basis of their respective incomes.

Deviations from the Child Support Calculations. Lastly, the court has the power to deviate from the child support calculations for the 11 reasons found in the statute.  This includes the catch-all, “any other adjustment that is needed to achieve an equitable result.”

Calculation of Child Support Obligation.  Once the parents’ net incomes are determined, these net incomes are added together and, along with the number of children, are used to determine the basic child support obligation by applying the guidelines schedule found in §61.30, Florida Statutes.  Adjustments are then made to the basic child support obligation by considering the amount of time-sharing, medical insurance and childcare costs, and any other appropriate deviations.

In summary, the factors used to calculate child support in Florida are the incomes of both parents, number of children, time-sharing, and other factors such as payment of medical insurance and childcare costs.  Establishing and calculating child support can be complicated; however, it is important to have an understanding of the basics of how child support is determined. It is always advisable to consult with an experienced family law attorney to ensure that your child support order is accurate, considers the specifics of your case, and protects the best interests of your child.  If you would like to discuss child support further, please click here to schedule a consultation.

Don’t Forget These Things in Your Divorce Settlement Agreement!

If you resolve your divorce amicably, either through an uncontested divorce process, mediation, or a collaborative divorce, you will end up signing a Marital Settlement Agreement.  The purpose of this document is to list out all of the terms of your divorce, including which of you will receive which assets and which debts, or some specific portion of various assets and debts (in other words, memorializing the terms of your equitable distribution).  It is very important that your Settlement Agreement be as exhaustive as possible and include every asset of some significance.

Most couples can work out personal property (furniture, clothes, appliances, etc.) without needing to clutter up a Settlement Agreement with such minute details. However, failure to include important assets can lead to confusion in the future over who it belongs to after the divorce is finalized.  Here is a list of assets we have found are commonly overlooked when divorcing:

  • Cryptocurrency. This has become a major source of investment for many people.  As such, it should be treated like any other marital asset and distributed according to the couple’s wishes.  All cryptocurrency accounts and amounts should be disclosed the same as bank accounts and investment accounts.  You should consult with a financial specialist if you are unclear on the monetary worth of cryptocurrencies as some can have a very significant value.
  • Jewelry. If you have jewelry you believe to be of significant value (which is for each couple to decide for themselves), then there is a good chance it should be included in the Settlement Agreement.  If the jewelry is of such a value, occasionally an appraisal will need to be performed to determine its total overall value.  But remember, wedding rings and engagement rings are not considered marital assets and are not subject to equitable distribution.
  • Hotel or Vacation Points. These can be quite easy to forget about when you are navigating a divorce.  But they can have value, and if nothing else it should be clear who is going to keep them and whether and how a transfer will be necessary to make that happen.
  • Future tax refunds for the prior year. If you are anticipating receiving a tax refund during or after the divorce, for a year in which you filed as married and are both entitled to a refund, you should ensure that is addressed in clear terms in your Settlement Agreement.  Some tax refunds are for substantial amounts and should not be overlooked.  The same goes true for tax liabilities as well.
  • Frequent Flyer Miles. Similar to hotel and vacation points, frequent flyer miles are easy to miss but can provide plenty of value.  Check to see whether and how frequent flyer miles can be transferred from one spouse to another if that is part of the Settlement Agreement.
  • Paid Time Off/Sick Leave Time. Florida law provides that accrued vacation and/or sick time which is unused at the time of divorce is a marital asset and subject to equitable distribution.  Not all vacation and sick time is created equal, however.  The employee must be eligible to be compensated for unused hours upon termination of employment.  This includes military vacation and sick time as well.  The non-employee spouse cannot choose to exercise the vacation or sick time on behalf of the employee spouse, so the total value of the benefit should be determined so the employee spouse can “buy out” the non-employee spouse for their share of the leave time’s value.
  • Cemetery Plots. Many spouses make arrangements to be buried next to each other.  This can be an expensive arrangement and should thus be addressed in the Settlement Agreement.  Otherwise, if there is lack of clarity after someone has passed away, it can lead to a host of complications.  Further, if one former spouse re-marries and wants to use the burial plot for their new spouse, if the agreement is silent as to who has claim to the burial plots, it is entirely possible that neither former spouse will be able to use the burial plots with a new spouse.

Equitable Distribution can be a daunting and complicated process, particularly for longer marriages which have had more time to accrue more marital assets.  This is why it is important to have an attorney review your equitable distribution, even if you don’t need legal advice on how to split things up.  Ensuring that you get your Marital Settlement Agreement done correctly and completely the first time can avoid uncertainty and potential legal intervention in the future.  We at Artemis Family Law Group are ready to discuss your thoughts about equitable distribution and the status of your Settlement Agreement.  Please click here to schedule a consultation at your convenience.

What Your Family Law Attorney Might Not Tell You (But Should): Part 1

 

Navigating the world of Florida family law can be a surreal, intimidating, and emotional experience.  Even if you have a practiced attorney on your side to help you through the legal intricacies of time-sharing, equitable distribution, alimony, child support, etc. there are often very important truths that go unspoken.  These important but unexpressed realities are concepts that individuals involved in a family law case should be familiar with and are also points that their attorneys should explicitly express to their clients, but often, fail to do so.

  1. Time-lines and Delays. For many individuals, the family law case they are a party to is their first instance of being involved in the legal system.  Many think that their case should proceed swiftly and assume, for example, they will be divorced within six months or less.  In reality, there are many different factors that can affect the time that it takes to completely resolve a case.  These different factors include the type of case it is (i.e., uncontested, contested, or Collaborative); the main issues in the case; the court’s availability for hearings or trials (this is different for each judge and county); the availability of both attorneys for each party; the availability of the parties; or even how well the attorneys for each party get along with each other.  You should be prepared for the potential delays and understand that your case may take longer than expected to reach a resolution.

 

  1. Things Out of Your Control.   That leads us to the second thing family law clients should grasp fully:  There are numerous things that can affect your case over which you have absolutely no control.  Family law cases can involve many people.  There is you, the other party, your attorney, the other party’s attorney, the judge, perhaps even other people like a mediator, parent coordinator, guardian ad litem, etc.  All these personalities, and how they interact, must be taken into consideration.  You, definitely, and to a very real extent, the other people involved in the case, will not be able to control how the other party behaves.  The other party may be exceedingly difficult, hostile, or uncooperative, and your case may not be moving forward in the way you believe it should be due to these reasons.  However,  understanding that these may be the very reasons which have brought you to the current case, understanding that your attorney is attempting to solve problems within those parameters, and understanding that neither you nor your attorney can totally control the other party’s behavior will lead to a great deal less stress during your case.

 

  1. “Tit-for-Tat” Behaviors (Parties and Attorney). Frequently, one party in a family law case will do something objectionable or even reprehensible, such as, make derogatory comments about the other parent to the children.  In response, that parent will engage in tit-for-tat behavior and since the other person did it (and did it first), feel that they should do a similar action as well.  Unacceptable behavior from anyone will be looked poorly upon by everyone involved. This includes the children, the attorneys, guardian ad litem, and most importantly, the court.  It may be frustrating but you do not and should not “get down in the dirt” when instances like the example above occur.  Doing so will only hurt your credibility, and your case, in the eyes of the court.  Further, the same thing holds true for your attorney: If the other party’s attorney engages in overly aggressive or unnecessary actions, please do not expect your attorney to engage in the same behavior or practice.  Judges absolutely talk with each other and are familiar with the “problem” attorneys.  If your attorney decided to unnecessarily “fight fire with fire,” the attorney’s reputation is on the line, it can affect your case negatively, and perhaps, more importantly to you, engaging in “tit-for-tat” behavior increases your legal fees.

 

  1. Financial Realities. That leads us to another thing of which individuals involved in a family law matter should be aware: You should have a very clear understanding of the potential financial implications of a family law case, and what can affect the amount of your legal fees.  The total amount of your legal fees is first, frequently unknown, and second, affected by things out of your control (see #2 above).  We realize it must be aggravating when, in response, to your questions about how much the case will cost you in total, your attorney responds with the completely maddening, “lawyer” answer, “It depends.”  However, it does depend.  It can depend on whether the case is uncontested, contested, or Collaborative; how well the attorneys get along; if the other attorney is especially aggressive and litigious; etc.  At best, your attorney will be able to provide an estimate as the case unfolds, and all the factors are considered (some of those factors being out of your and your attorney’s control).  If your case goes to trial, that trial fee is in addition to attorney’s fees you have already paid, and it can become very expensive.

 

  1. Your Day in Court is Not Going to Be Epic. This leads us to the truth about trials: Many people involved in a family law case believe that the only way their case will be resolved is before a judge. They imagine, for example, their divorce trial will be their day in court to tell their story to the judge who will then rightfully see how they have been wronged by the other person. Just like in the movies, justice will prevail, and it will be epic.  However, the very unspectacular reality is that the majority of family law cases are settled; only a small percentage go to trial.  Further, what many people need to realize is that usually, going to trial is not in their best interests.  There is rarely a “slam dunk” case and a “winner.”  A judge wholly unaware of you, your life, your children’s lives, etc. will listen for two hours, four hours, eight hours, two days, etc. to your attorneys, your testimony, the other party’s testimony, and perhaps, the testimony of other witnesses.  After the completion of those hours or days, the judge will make decisions affecting your future and the future of your children.  Simply, going to trial is one of the ultimate gambles of your life and one which despite the facts or law being on your side or the attorney you have, is really out of your control.

 

  1. You Do Not Want An “Aggressive,” “Bull-Dog” Attorney. Tying in with all of the other truths above is this:  What many people involved in family law cases are unaware of is that the skilled family law attorneys are rarely in court.  A skilled, experienced family law attorney acts as a problem-solver to craft settlements in mediation or through the Collaborative process that will be acceptable and beneficial to you, allows you to have some part in shaping your future, and keeps you out of the ultimate gamble of trial. Of course, this is not universal in all cases.  Advocating for you and going to trial where necessary is something that a skilled, experienced family law attorney does as well.  However, it is usually the attorneys that only want to make money off of your case that know the way to do so is to be unreasonable, not accept or give reasonable or rational settlement offers, and take everything to trial.

 

It is important to note that not all family law attorneys withhold these truths purposely (or at all), act unreasonably, or are the “problem” attorney.  The Artemis Approach believes that clear, realistic, and truthful communication is essential to ensure clients can make informed decisions during what can be a stressful and emotional process.  If you have questions regarding a family matter, we would be happy to discuss them further with you.  Please schedule a consultation today.

Case Study: One Fictional Couple’s Journey Through Traditional and Collaborative Divorce

The world of family law can be a mysterious one to outsiders.  Even if you have been through a divorce, your knowledge and experience is limited to your unique encounter with the family law system.  However, once you’ve seen the process play out time and time again, you begin to see patterns and similarities.  Below is a fictional example of how one couple, “John” and “Betty,” navigate the family law system through the traditional litigation method and the collaborative divorce method.  While this is by no means a representation of how every divorce unfolds, either traditionally or collaboratively, it is emblematic of the key differences between the two methods and showcases how the collaborative method can de-escalate problems while traditional litigation can often make matters worse.

Events Traditional Litigation Divorce Collaborative Divorce
Initial Filing John and Betty’s marriage had reached a breaking point, and they decided to end their relationship. However, they took separate paths in their divorce approach. John hired an aggressive attorney focused on winning the case, while Betty chose a lawyer who believed in a collaborative approach to conflict resolution. This difference in approach set the tone for the entire divorce process, leading to an adversarial environment from the start. Despite their many differences, John and Betty recognized the importance of resolving their issues amicably, especially for the sake of their children. They jointly decided to pursue a collaborative divorce, where they committed to working together respectfully and openly, seeking solutions that benefit both of them. This joint decision fostered an atmosphere of cooperation and respect throughout the process.
Temporary Time-Sharing (Custody) As John and Betty couldn’t agree on temporary time-sharing arrangements during the divorce process, the court had to step in to determine a schedule. This resulted in multiple court hearings, escalating tensions, and emotional strain on both parents and the children. The prolonged legal battle took a significant toll on the family, affecting the children’s well-being and causing financial stress due to increased legal fees. Opting for a collaborative approach, John and Betty engaged in a series of meetings with their collaborative attorneys and a child specialist. These discussions allowed them to understand the children’s needs better and craft a temporary time-sharing arrangement that considered their schedules, preferences, and emotional needs. By avoiding court intervention, they reduced stress on the children and preserved their sense of stability during the divorce.  This issue also resolved much faster than waiting on a court to have hearing availability and to issue a ruling.
Division of Assets During the traditional litigation divorce, John and Betty’s lawyers engaged in aggressive negotiations over asset division. Each party aimed to secure the most favorable outcome, leading to bitterness and hostility. The lack of open communication and trust resulted in a prolonged discovery process, with both sides refusing to share critical financial information willingly. In contrast, the collaborative divorce process embraced transparency. John and Betty, along with their joint financial specialist, shared their financial information openly and honestly. This allowed both parties to gain a comprehensive understanding of the family’s financial situation and work together to divide assets fairly.
Time-Sharing (Custody) In the traditional litigation divorce, disagreements over time-sharing (custody) were at the center of the conflict. John and Betty viewed their children’s future living arrangements differently, leading to contentious court battles. The children, caught in the middle, suffered emotionally from the constant tension and uncertainty. By choosing collaborative, John and Betty focused on the best interests of their children. They participated in joint sessions with a child specialist, who helped them understand the impact of divorce on their children’s lives. This deeper understanding allowed John and Betty to develop a comprehensive parenting plan that addressed the children’s emotional, academic, and social needs. The collaborative approach emphasized co-parenting, promoting a healthier and more stable environment for the children during and after the divorce.
Spousal Support The contentious nature of the traditional litigation divorce extended to spousal support. John and Betty disagreed on the amount and duration of support, leading to mediation failures. As a result, the court had to intervene and impose a spousal support decision, leaving both parties dissatisfied with the outcome. In the collaborative model, John and Betty engaged in a series of discussions facilitated by their attorneys and financial specialist. They openly discussed their financial circumstances, future financial goals, and individual needs. Through empathy and compromise, they reached a fair spousal support agreement that considered their respective abilities to support themselves post-divorce. The collaborative negotiations allowed both John and Betty to feel heard and respected, leading to a mutually agreeable arrangement.
Communication Issues In the traditional litigation divorce, the lack of communication between John’s attorney and Betty’s attorney often led to misunderstandings. This communication breakdown resulted in unnecessary conflicts and fueled distrust between the parties. The attorneys became a barrier to communication, heightening emotions and preventing any meaningful resolution. Recognizing the significance of effective communication, the collaborative attorneys encouraged direct communication between John and Betty. Through joint meetings and regular check-ins, John and Betty were able to express their concerns, share their perspectives, and find common ground. The collaborative attorneys acted as facilitators, ensuring that the conversations remained constructive and respectful. This improved communication helped build trust and cooperation between John and Betty, setting a positive tone for the entire process.
Discovery Process The formal discovery process in the traditional litigation divorce required an overwhelming exchange of documents, contributing to a contentious atmosphere. John and Betty’s attorneys engaged in extensive requests for information and documentation, leading to increased legal fees and delaying the resolution of the divorce. In the collaborative model, the financial specialist played a vital role in the exchange of information. The specialist guided John and Betty through the process of gathering relevant financial documents efficiently. By focusing on the necessary information and employing open communication, the collaborative process streamlined the discovery phase, saving time and reducing costs. This allowed John and Betty to concentrate on resolving their issues rather than getting bogged down in extensive paperwork.
Court Delays The traditional litigation divorce faced delays due to court backlogs and scheduling conflicts, further prolonging the emotional strain on John and Betty. The uncertainty caused by these delays intensified their anxieties, making it challenging for them to move forward. By choosing a collaborative approach, John and Betty were able to control the timeline of their divorce. They held meetings and discussions on their terms, without waiting for court dates. This efficient resolution allowed them to process their emotions and begin their post-divorce lives sooner. The reduced waiting time contributed to a smoother transition for everyone involved.
 Trial In the traditional litigation divorce, the trial turned into a battle of accusations, as each party tried to paint the other in a negative light. The children were caught in the crossfire, witnessing their parents’ hostility and experiencing emotional turmoil. In the collaborative approach, John and Betty avoided a contentious trial. Instead, they worked together with the child specialist to ensure the children’s well-being remained the top priority. The specialist provided guidance on how to communicate effectively with the children about the divorce, minimizing the emotional impact. This cooperative approach allowed the children to feel supported and loved, even as their parents went through the divorce process.
Final Resolution The traditional litigation divorce ended with a final divorce decree handed down by the judge, a stranger to the family. The contentious and emotionally draining process left John and Betty with long-lasting resentment towards each other, making it challenging for them to co-parent effectively.  Both spent enormous sums of money to litigate their divorce for well over a year, possibly years.  And even when the final judgment was handed down, both John and Betty appealed because of issues each of them had with the decisions of the judge.  The appellate process took another year to resolve and cost a hefty amount of money for both John and Betty.  And still, neither John nor Better were satisfied with the outcome. The collaborative divorce concluded with John and Betty reaching a respectful closure. They mutually agreed on all aspects of their divorce, fostering a sense of understanding and empathy for each other’s perspectives. This amicable agreement allowed them to transition into their new roles as co-parents with a foundation of respect and cooperation. The collaborative process empowered John and Betty to communicate openly and work together in the best interests of their children, facilitating a healthier post-divorce relationship.

We know this is a lot of information to process.  Your situation is unique and should be treated as such.  We welcome the opportunity to discuss your divorce options, both traditional and collaborative, so please schedule a consultation with us today.